ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the treatment outcomes of the modified extension block technique for bony mallet finger. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 16 patients who had been treated with the modified extension block technique for bony mallet finger from December 2002 to January 2004. The average duration of follow up was 13 (12~17) months. The indication of operation was the presence of a large bony fragment invading more than 1/3 of the articular surface or the palmar subluxation in the distal interphalangeal joint. RESULTS: The average extension lag was 2.3 degrees, and the range of motion of the distal interphalangeal joint was 68.8 degrees. Radiograph showed bony union state in all cases. By the Crawford's evaluation criteria, 12 cases (75%) was excellent or good. Postoperative complications occurred in 3 cases, which were reduction loss within postoperative 2 weeks in 2 cases and mild pain with motion in 1 case. CONCLUSION: The modified extension block technique is a easy and simple method. It shows a good result without complications from skin incision. So, it seems a useful method for bony mallet finger.
Subject(s)
Humans , Fingers , Follow-Up Studies , Joints , Postoperative Complications , Range of Motion, Articular , SkinABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the arthroscopic findings between autograft group and allograft group minimal 1 year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From Jul. 1999 to Feb. 2002, we performed second look arthroscopy to 55 patients(60 knees), who had already received anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction minimal 1 years ago(average 16 months) in our hospital. All patients visited our hospital just for removal of tibial hardware. Among 60 knees, 24 cases had operated using bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft(group 1), 36 cases using Achilles tendon allograft(group 2). We evaluated the clinical results by instability, subjective complaint and level of activity. Also we analyzed the second look arthroscopic findings by graft revascularization, fissuring, laxity and intraarticular general status. RESULTS: There was no differene in clinical results except 2 patients who complained mild anterior knee pain in group 1. At second look arthroscopy, well vascularized cases were 13 cases(54%) in group 1 and 15 cases(41%) in group 2 respectively. Fissuring of graft was more prominent in group 2(5 cases, 14%) rather than group 1(3 cases, 9%). Fibrous tissue formation around graft was found in 3 cases(14%) of group 1 and 7 cases(20%) of group2. According to Outerbridge grading system of articular cartilage, more than grade II change in patellofemoral joint were detected more prominently in group 1(7 cases, 32%) than group 2(7 cases, 21%). CONCLUSION: In clinical results, there was no difference between Achilles allograft and Bone-Patellar tendon-Bone autograft used for reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament. On second look arthroscopy, patellofemoral arthrosis was more prominent in autograft group, but revascularization of graft and the change of perigraft tissue showed more favorable result.